Disclaimer: All facts gleaned from the filings stated hereafter are only as truthful as the petitioner. The tone of this article expresses a style of writing historically employed by America’s greatest writers and, as such, is for opinion purposes only. No intentional harm is due. Do not read if the topic of divorce (even your own) causes you emotional distress. Continue at your own risk.

By early December, Cook County had already slipped into its annual routine of wreaths, deadlines, and quiet reckonings. Holiday music filled grocery aisles. Court filings kept moving. On December 8, 2025, Joan Burns added her name to that ledger, filing a Petition for Dissolution of Marriage in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois, as the season leaned heavily toward reflection rather than repair.

Joan Burns and Andre Burns, Sr. were married on March 20, 1981, in Chicago—a marriage that lasted long enough to raise two children, both now emancipated, and to accumulate property, debt, and the long residue of shared life. The petition states that irreconcilable differences caused an irretrievable breakdown of the marriage, with reconciliation no longer realistic or in the family’s best interest. The parties had already lived separate and apart for more than six months before the filing.

Days earlier, on December 4, 2025, Joan was granted an Emergency Order of Protection, including exclusive possession of the marital residence. The filing notes that Andre receives Social Security benefits and has sufficient assets and income to support himself, and asks that both parties be barred from any claims for maintenance or spousal support.

Represented by MAMMAS I GOLDBERG I VANDERPORTEN, Joan requests that the court dissolve the marriage, equitably divide marital property and liabilities—including the South Holland residence and other assets such as vehicles—while allowing each party to retain their respective non-marital property. She further asks for an equitable apportionment of marital and non-marital debts and for such other relief as equity may require.

Outside the courthouse, the season pressed on, insisting on joy. Inside the petition, the language was steadier—measured, restrained, and final.

Please contact VowBreakers for access to documents related to the case.