Disclaimer: All facts gleaned from the filings stated hereafter are only as truthful as the petitioner. The tone of this article expresses a style of writing historically employed by America’s greatest writers and, as such, is for opinion purposes only. No intentional harm is due. Do not read if the topic of divorce (even your own) causes you emotional distress. Continue at your own risk.
There is a certain economy to the way this filing presents itself, as if it understands that the court requires clarity more than elaboration. Brian A. Simer petitions for dissolution of his marriage to Wendy D. Simer in the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, Family Court Division. The document, submitted in April 8, 2026, records a marriage that began on July 25, 1998, and now arrives at a formal request for its end.
Both parties are described as having met the residency requirements of the state, each living in Missouri for more than ninety days before the filing. The timeline is marked with a single, decisive point of separation—September 21, 2025. No children are at issue, and the petition confirms that no pregnancy is involved, narrowing the scope of the court’s inquiry.
The language of the filing is measured. It states that both parties are capable of supporting themselves and that neither seeks maintenance. It acknowledges the presence of non-marital assets belonging to each party, as well as property and obligations accumulated during the marriage. The petitioner asks the court either to approve any settlement the parties may reach or, failing that, to divide those assets and debts in a fair and equitable manner.
There is also a conditional note regarding attorney’s fees, reserved in the event the matter cannot be resolved amicably. Beyond that, the central claim is direct: the marriage is irretrievably broken, with no reasonable likelihood of preservation. It is this assertion that anchors the request for dissolution.
Such filings do not attempt to reconstruct the life they conclude. Instead, they distill it into terms the court can act upon—dates, capacities, property, and final requests. What follows is a process that will give these terms legal effect, turning a shared history into a set of defined outcomes governed by the structure of the law.
Please contact VowBreakers for access to documents related to the case.
