Disclaimer: All facts gleaned from the filings stated hereafter are only as truthful as the petitioner. The tone of this article expresses a style of writing historically employed by America’s greatest writers and, as such, is for opinion purposes only. No intentional harm is due. Do not read if the topic of divorce (even your own) causes you emotional distress. Continue at your own risk.
In a quiet corner of St. Charles County, Missouri, the Neubauers, Joseph T. and Tracy K., have brought forth a petition for the dissolution of their once-promising marital union. The filing, dated September 27, 2023, paints a picture of a bond long fractured. The couple who are both residents of St. Charles wed on March 21, 2014, yet have dwelled separately since the fateful day of March 13, 2018. An air of finality clings to their entwined history, as they both concede that the marriage is irretrievably broken.
No children graced their union, and no expectation of progeny lingers. The court is now the arbiter of their parting. The petitioner seeks a clean severance, desiring neither alimony nor entangled financial obligations and maintenance. A judicious division of assets, including separate, non-marital property, is his entreaty. Tracy, the respondent, is to have her maiden name reinstated, marking a symbolic return to her prior self.
Representing the petitioner is Michael Hanson of Michael Hanson Law Office, a stalwart in navigating this legal dissolution. The proceedings hold a certain Orwellian simplicity – a stark, unsentimental unveiling of human relationships in their twilight. The pageantry of union fades, and in its place, a dispassionate gaze settles on division and reclamation.
Please contact VowBreakers for access to documents related to the case.
