Disclaimer: All facts gleaned from the filings stated hereafter are only as truthful as the petitioner. The tone of this article expresses a style of writing historically employed by America’s greatest writers and, as such, is for opinion purposes only. No intentional harm is due. Do not read if the topic of divorce (even your own) causes you emotional distress. Continue at your own risk.
In the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, a petition now marks the formal unraveling of a marriage that began less than two years ago. ALICIA L. KIRCHOFF has asked the court to dissolve her marriage to WILLIAM S. KIRCHOFF JR., initiating proceedings under Missouri law.
The petition, filed February 9, 2026, states that both parties have been Missouri residents for more than 90 days preceding the filing and are over the age of 18. The couple was married on May 10, 2023, in Jackson County, Missouri, and separated in September 2024. The filing asserts that the marriage is “irretrievably broken” and that there is no reasonable likelihood it can be preserved. Neither party is on active duty with the Armed Forces of the United States, and the petition notes that the wife is not pregnant.
Financial questions form the core of the requested relief. According to the petition, the husband has sufficient financial resources to meet his own reasonable needs and does not require maintenance. The wife, by contrast, asserts that she lacks sufficient financial resources to meet her own reasonable needs and requests monthly maintenance from the husband. She further asks the court to award her separate property, to divide marital property and debts in a fair and equitable manner, and to order the husband to contribute to her attorney fees and costs, citing his ability to do so.
The petition closes with a standard request for any additional relief the court deems just and proper. In early February, as courts continue the steady cadence of new filings that define the year’s legal docket, this case joins many others that begin with a single assertion: that a marriage cannot continue as it has been, and that the law must now chart the terms of its conclusion.
Please contact VowBreakers for access to documents related to the case.
