Disclaimer: All facts gleaned from the filings stated hereafter are only as truthful as the petitioner. The tone of this article expresses a style of writing historically employed by America’s greatest writers and, as such, is for opinion purposes only. No intentional harm is due. Do not read if the topic of divorce (even your own) causes you emotional distress. Continue at your own risk.
In the heartland of St. Louis City, a quiet, yet profound chapter in the lives of Eloretta Mary Smith and James Coleman Smith begins to unfold. The document, filed on November 2, 2023, echoes the ever-familiar refrain of “irreconcilable differences” as the reason behind the dissolution of their union, refraining from assigning blame or pointing fingers.
Their journey, a testament to time, commenced on August 15, 1969, and now stands at a juncture where the past leads to a fork in the road. The couple’s children, born of their union, have long reached emancipation, and the document makes no mention of child support or parental decision-making. It is a dissolution that appears to revolve around the profound shift in the dynamics of their relationship over the decades.
The petitioner’s prayers, presented by attorney Charles E. Kirksey, Jr., follow a path well-trodden in the annals of family law. Eloretta Mary Smith seeks the dissolution of the marriage and the awarding of separate property to both parties. There are no claims for maintenance, and the document leaves room for other orders deemed fit by the court.
In its simplicity, the Smiths’ divorce case in St. Louis City is emblematic of the countless stories that go unnoticed. It lacks the sensationalism and conflict that often dominate headlines, yet it represents a significant milestone in the lives of two individuals who have, in their own quiet way, weathered the storms and now seek separate paths.
Please contact VowBreakers for access to documents related to the case.
