Disclaimer: All facts gleaned from the filings stated hereafter are only as truthful as the petitioner. The tone of this article expresses a style of writing historically employed by America’s greatest writers and, as such, is for opinion purposes only. No intentional harm is due. Do not read if the topic of divorce (even your own) causes you emotional distress. Continue at your own risk.
In the heart of Chicago, Illinois, the Bober household is at the center of a legal storm as Brian J. Bober and Kathrina G. Bober file for dissolution of their union. With one child born of their marriage, 8 years old, and another from Kathrina’s previous relationship, age 17 years old, the complexities of parental responsibility weigh heavily in this case.
The reasons behind the dissolution are attributed to “irreconcilable differences,” a phrase that echoes through the filing without casting blame on either party. Filed on October 20, 2023, this case lays bare the intricacies of a marriage that has succumbed to the inexorable passage of time.
Brian and Kathrina, represented by Christi Alexander of the Law Office of Christi Alexander, articulate a clear set of prayers to the court. They both seek to be barred from receiving maintenance, underscoring their self-sufficiency. The division of marital property, encompassing real estate, financial accounts, vehicles, and personal belongings, stands as a testament to the complexities of untangling shared lives.
The court is faced with the challenging task of allocating primary parenting time and sole parental responsibility to Brian, a decision that will shape the future of their child. Kathrina, in turn, is ordered to provide financial support for the minor, a crucial element in ensuring the child’s well-being.
As for the division of property, an equitable share is to be awarded to each party, reflecting the accumulated assets and debts of their shared life. Brian’s non-marital property is earmarked for his exclusive possession.
In this intricate legal dance, both parties bear the weight of their respective attorney’s fees and costs incurred throughout the proceedings. The court also grants Kathrina the right to revert to her former name, signifying a symbolic step toward independence.
The Bober case is a microcosm of the complex narratives that unfold within the realm of marriage dissolution. It represents not only the end of a union but also the intricate process of untangling shared lives, where the scales of justice strive to balance the aspirations and responsibilities of both parties.
Please contact VowBreakers for access to documents related to the case.
