Disclaimer: All facts gleaned from the filings stated hereafter are only as truthful as the petitioner. The tone of this article expresses a style of writing historically employed by America’s greatest writers and, as such, is for opinion purposes only. No intentional harm is due. Do not read if the topic of divorce (even your own) causes you emotional distress. Continue at your own risk.
In the realm of familial dissolution, the marriage of Diana Lynn Gross and Eric Shaun Gross is under scrutiny as they navigate the tumultuous waters of separation. Filed on September 20, 2023, in Jackson County, Missouri, this petition for the dissolution of their union is fraught with complexity and emotion.
Diana, the petitioner, and Eric, the respondent, have resided in Jackson County for the requisite ninety days, meeting the jurisdictional criteria for this legal endeavor. Their paths, once intertwined in matrimony, have now diverged, leading to the necessity of this dissolution.
Both individuals, having attained adulthood, entered into marriage on a date that remains undisclosed in the provided document. Their separation, while leading them to separate abodes, marks the consequence of irreconcilable differences, a chasm too vast to bridge. It is the irreversible breakdown of their marriage that compels this legal action, rendering their union irretrievably broken.
In addition to personal details, such as their Social Security Numbers and current employment status, the document discloses that neither party is on active duty with the Armed Forces. Pregnancy is not a factor in this dissolution, but their shared parenthood is.
Two unemancipated children have witnessed the dissolution of their parents’ union, residing primarily with both petitioner and respondent in the sixty days preceding the filing. The welfare of these children is paramount, with Diana urging the court to grant joint legal and physical custody, as detailed in her Proposed Parenting Plan.
Financial matters are integral to this process, as Diana petitions for child support, requesting it be ordered retroactively from the date of filing. The equitable division of property and debts is also a point of contention, with the identification of marital and non-marital assets requiring attention.
Diana further seeks to revert to her maiden name, Lee, while maintaining her commitment to transparency and fairness throughout the proceedings. Her choice of legal counsel, Abigail Rosales from The Worstell Law Firm, underscores the gravity of this situation and the importance of experienced guidance.
In closing, Diana makes her prayers known to the court, including the dissolution of the marriage, joint custody arrangements, child support, equitable property division, and more. The court is called upon to make just and fair decisions in this intricate web of familial dissolution, where the past meets the future in the chambers of Jackson County, Missouri.
Please contact VowBreakers for access to documents related to the case.
