Disclaimer: All facts gleaned from the filings stated hereafter are only as truthful as the petitioner. The tone of this article expresses a style of writing historically employed by America’s greatest writers and, as such, is for opinion purposes only. No intentional harm is due. Do not read if the topic of divorce (even your own) causes you emotional distress. Continue at your own risk.

Monica Kathleen Cassidy-Carter filed a petition in Jackson County Circuit Court on February 5, 2026, seeking the dissolution of her marriage to Michael Lewis Carter. The couple was married on June 6, 1998, in Kansas City, Jackson County, Missouri, and separated on or about January 20, 2026. Both parties have resided in Missouri for at least ninety days preceding the petition, establishing the court’s jurisdiction and laying the groundwork for property and maintenance considerations.

The petition outlines that the marriage is irretrievably broken. It identifies marital property and debts accumulated over nearly three decades, requesting a fair and equitable division under Missouri law. Cassidy-Carter also seeks approval of a potential written Marital Settlement Agreement should the parties finalize one prior to the hearing. The filing emphasizes the retroactive maintenance she requests, as well as continued insurance coverage for herself and any minor children during the proceedings.

Cassidy-Carter further requests that the court require Michael Carter to pay her attorneys’ fees, expert witness fees, and related court costs, framing the petition as a comprehensive approach to resolving both financial and legal responsibilities. Neither party is on active military duty, eliminating special considerations under the Servicemembers Civil Relief Act. The petition is submitted through her attorney, Erica A. Driskell, who formally attested to its accuracy and completeness under oath.

This filing situates the couple’s private transition within a formalized process that determines responsibility and resource allocation. By codifying property division, maintenance, and legal obligations, the court provides structure and clarity to what is otherwise a personal adjustment, emphasizing the role of institutional resolution in managing long-term commitments and their dissolution.

Please contact VowBreakers for access to documents related to the case.