Disclaimer: All facts gleaned from the filings stated hereafter are only as truthful as the petitioner. The tone of this article expresses a style of writing historically employed by America’s greatest writers and, as such, is for opinion purposes only. No intentional harm is due. Do not read if the topic of divorce (even your own) causes you emotional distress. Continue at your own risk.
In the shadowed corridors of Cook County’s courts, where human ties are weighed and unwound, a marriage’s long arc bends toward its end. On July 31, 2025, Ginevive A. Louw, guided by Paul P. Rivera of Paul P. Rivera, P.C., petitioned to dissolve her bond with Jacobus F. Louw. Married on April 28, 2005, in the Philippines’ warm embrace, their twenty-year union crumbled under irreconcilable differences, marked by over six months of living apart. Their story, once vibrant with shared dreams, now rests in the hands of justice.
Their son, Myron Kobe, fifteen and residing with Jacobus in the Philippines, stands as their shared legacy. Yet, the court’s reach over his custody is limited, jurisdiction withheld by the Uniform Child Custody Jurisdiction and Enforcement Act. Ginevive, at forty-nine, seeks no maintenance, nor does Jacobus, retired at sixty-seven, both standing firm on their own. Their marital estate—furniture, cars, bank accounts—awaits equitable division, alongside debts accrued through years of intertwined lives. Non-marital property, too, must find its rightful place.
The courtroom, a silent arbiter, holds the threads of their past. Ginevive’s plea is for fairness: a dissolution to free them, a just apportionment of assets and obligations, and a future unburdened by the weight of what was. In this delicate untangling, the law must carve a path forward, preserving dignity where love has faded.
Please contact VowBreakers for access to documents related to the case.
