Disclaimer: All facts gleaned from the filings stated hereafter are only as truthful as the petitioner. The tone of this article expresses a style of writing historically employed by America’s greatest writers and, as such, is for opinion purposes only. No intentional harm is due. Do not read if the topic of divorce (even your own) causes you emotional distress. Continue at your own risk.
In the annals of the City of St. Louis, Missouri, a marital narrative unfolds between Hanna Michelle Mohesky and Alec Joel Bland. Filed on February 23, 2024, the petition for dissolution marks the denouement of a union sealed on December 11, 2021, devoid of offspring.
Couched in legal language, the document portrays the marriage as irretrievably broken, seeking the dissolution of the union. Attorney Gary M. Siegel and Brittany D. Erker advocate for Hanna Michelle Mohesky, omitting requests for maintenance or child support, as no children were born of the liaison.
The petition underscores the division of marital property and debt, a specter looming over the estranged couple. Neither party seeks sole responsibility or parental decision-making, a testament to the absence of progeny.
Within the courtroom crucible, the petition’s quotes resonate. “There is no reasonable likelihood that the marriage can be preserved,” echoing the irretrievable breakdown. It portrays Alec Joel Bland as financially solvent, capable of bearing his legal burdens.
As the legal drama unfurls, it captures the zeitgeist of modern relationships. The dissolution underscores the complexities of marital unions, their dissolution emblematic of broader societal shifts.
Please contact VowBreakers for access to documents related to the case.
