Disclaimer: All facts gleaned from the filings stated hereafter are only as truthful as the petitioner. The tone of this article expresses a style of writing historically employed by America’s greatest writers and, as such, is for opinion purposes only. No intentional harm is due. Do not read if the topic of divorce (even your own) causes you emotional distress. Continue at your own risk.
A marriage that began in Chicago in late December 2007 now stands before the Domestic Relations Division of the Circuit Court of Cook County. Eli Nussbaum has asked the court to dissolve his marriage to Amy R. Nussbaum, filing a verified petition on January 30, 2026. The case, assigned number 2026D000710, seeks relief under the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act.
In his petition, Eli states that both he and Amy have maintained residence in Cook County for the statutory period required to proceed. He identifies their date and place of marriage and confirms that four children were born to or adopted by the parties during the marriage. No other dissolution action, he asserts, is pending in Illinois or elsewhere.
The filing describes irreconcilable differences that have led to an irretrievable breakdown of the marriage. According to the petition, attempts at reconciliation have failed and further efforts would be impracticable and not in the parties’ best interests. The parties have lived separate and apart for more than six months prior to the filing. Eli asks the court to enter a judgment dissolving the marriage and to establish an allocation judgment addressing decision-making responsibilities and parenting time. He requests joint decision-making authority, or, alternatively, sole authority if the court finds joint decision-making inappropriate.
The petition further asks the court to determine child support and child-related expenses in accordance with statutory guidelines, to divide marital property equitably, to assign marital debts, and to allow each party to retain nonmarital property free of claim. It also requests that any maintenance award be determined under the governing statute and that Amy be barred from seeking contribution to attorneys’ fees.
Filings of this kind move forward without spectacle. They mark the formal beginning of a process that unfolds in scheduled hearings, financial disclosures, and negotiated terms. In late January, as a new year settles into its routines, the petition places the future of a long marriage into the steady hands of procedural law, where timelines and statutes shape what comes next.
Please contact VowBreakers for access to documents related to the case.
