Disclaimer: All facts gleaned from the filings stated hereafter are only as truthful as the petitioner. The tone of this article expresses a style of writing historically employed by America’s greatest writers and, as such, is for opinion purposes only. No intentional harm is due. Do not read if the topic of divorce (even your own) causes you emotional distress. Continue at your own risk.
There is a rhythm to the way marriages enter the public record when they end. In the Circuit Court of Jackson County, Missouri, at Independence, a petition filed February 10, 2026, asks that the marriage of Jeremy Alan Brown and Mary Helen Jackman be dissolved under Missouri law. The case proceeds on a contested track, with service by special process server.
The petition states that both parties have been residents of Missouri for more than 90 days preceding the filing. They were married on October 14, 2019, in Lee’s Summit, and the marriage was registered in Jackson County. A separation is recorded as having occurred on or about February 1, 2026, though the parties continue to reside in the same household.
One minor child was born during the marriage. The filing asserts that Missouri is the child’s home state and that the court has jurisdiction to determine custody. It requests joint legal and joint physical custody, with the respondent’s residence designated for mailing and educational purposes, pursuant to a proposed parenting plan to be filed. The petition also seeks child support calculated under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 88.01 and Form 14, along with provisions for medical and related expenses. It affirms that neither party has participated in other custody litigation and that no other person claims custody or visitation rights.
The document further acknowledges marital and separate property, as well as debts of both kinds, and asks the court either to approve any marital settlement agreement reached by the parties or to divide assets and liabilities fairly and equitably. It states that neither party requires maintenance and that each is able to pay his or her own attorney’s fees. The marriage, the petitioner contends, is irretrievably broken, with no reasonable likelihood of preservation.
In midwinter, when the calendar is still new, such filings convert private transitions into formal proceedings. The petition does not narrate the history of the relationship; it sets out the statutory elements that allow the court to act. From here, the case will move through the mechanisms Missouri provides—jurisdiction established, support calculated, property divided—until judgment brings administrative closure to what was once a shared life.
Please contact VowBreakers for access to documents related to the case.
