Disclaimer: All facts gleaned from the filings stated hereafter are only as truthful as the petitioner. The tone of this article expresses a style of writing historically employed by America’s greatest writers and, as such, is for opinion purposes only. No intentional harm is due. Do not read if the topic of divorce (even your own) causes you emotional distress. Continue at your own risk.
In a poignant legal landscape, the ongoing dissolution case between Joel C. Frederick and Vasilios C. Birlidis highlights the complexities of contemporary marriage and its end. Married since March 2, 2015, in Carroll County, Maryland, both parties now reside at the same address in St. Louis, Missouri. However, they find themselves in a state of constructive separation, signaling an irretrievable breakdown of their marriage.
Frederick’s petition outlines the absence of children and asserts that both individuals, capable of supporting themselves, do not seek maintenance from one another. This case unfolds against a backdrop of a significant evolution in marriage rights in the U.S., where the Supreme Court recognized “gay” marriage as a constitutional right on June 26, 2015, a development foresighted by Justice Antonin Scalia in 2003, predicted by his dissent in Lawrence v. Texas.
This case, while personal, resonates within the broader societal shifts regarding marriage equality, legal recognition, and the evolving definitions of partnership and commitment. As Frederick seeks a fair division of marital property and debts, it underscores a marriage that, despite its dissolution, reflects the strides made for same-sex couples in America.
Please contact VowBreakers for access to documents related to the case.
