Disclaimer: All facts gleaned from the filings stated hereafter are only as truthful as the petitioner. The tone of this article expresses a style of writing historically employed by America’s greatest writers and, as such, is for opinion purposes only. No intentional harm is due. Do not read if the topic of divorce (even your own) causes you emotional distress. Continue at your own risk.
A petition now pending in the St. Louis County Circuit Court proposes the formal end of a marriage that began more than two decades ago. Filed February 4, 2026, under case number 26SL-DR00497, the action was brought by Katrina E. Bryan against Michael J. Bryan.
Katrina states that she has been a resident of Missouri for at least ninety days preceding the filing and that Michael has met the same requirement. They were married March 26, 2004, in Johnson County, Missouri, where the marriage was registered. The parties separated on or about April 29, 2025.
Three children were born during the marriage. According to the petition, they have resided with both parents in Missouri for the six months immediately preceding the filing. Katrina affirms that she has not participated in other custody proceedings and is unaware of any action that could affect the present case. She requests that the court award joint legal and joint physical custody pursuant to a proposed parenting plan, and that child support be ordered in accordance with Missouri Supreme Court Rule 88.01 and Form 14 guidelines, retroactive to the filing date.
The petition asserts that the marriage is irretrievably broken and that no reasonable likelihood of preservation remains. It asks the court to set aside each party’s separate property and divide marital property and debts in a fair and equitable manner. Katrina seeks maintenance, stating that she lacks sufficient income and property to meet her reasonable needs, while asserting that Michael is not in need of maintenance. She further requests an award of child support and appropriate orders regarding costs and other relief.
February filings often signal the conversion of private decisions into public record. The petition does not narrate the years between 2004 and 2025; it itemizes them. What follows will unfold within statutory boundaries—custody schedules, financial disclosures, judicial determinations—through which the court translates a long marriage into a set of enforceable conclusions.
Please contact VowBreakers for access to documents related to the case.
