Disclaimer: All facts gleaned from the filings stated hereafter are only as truthful as the petitioner. The tone of this article expresses a style of writing historically employed by America’s greatest writers and, as such, is for opinion purposes only. No intentional harm is due. Do not read if the topic of divorce (even your own) causes you emotional distress. Continue at your own risk.
There’s something starkly honest about filing for divorce while the year is still technically alive. On December 31, 2025, with resolutions still unwritten and champagne still chilled, Julie Tarjan lodged her petition for dissolution of marriage in the Circuit Court of Cook County, Illinois—a choice that feels less like drama and more like refusal to carry unfinished weight into a new calendar.
The marriage, registered in Cook County on August 18, 2007, produced three children and years of shared logistics, shared debts, shared expectations. But the petition makes clear that irreconcilable differences hollowed out the relationship long before the filing. Attempts at reconciliation, it states, failed. Future ones would be impracticable. This is not a story about surprise; it is a record of acceptance.
Represented by attorney Michael C. Roberts, Tarjan asks the court to dissolve the bonds of matrimony and to take up the work that private cooperation could no longer manage. She seeks an allocation of parental responsibilities and parenting time, an equitable division of marital property and debt, and confirmation that each party retains their respective non-marital property. The petition requests that both parties be barred from seeking maintenance from one another, signaling financial independence rather than mutual dependence. It also asks that Tarjan be permitted, if she chooses, to resume the use of her maiden name, Zuhlke—an option framed not as rejection, but as reclamation.
End-of-year divorce filings often read like emotional footnotes, squeezed in before offices close. January filings, by contrast, like to posture as fresh starts. This one does neither. It is a clean stop, filed deliberately before midnight, asserting that closure is not a failure of hope—but sometimes the clearest form of self-respect.
Please contact VowBreakers for access to documents related to the case.
