Disclaimer: All facts gleaned from the filings stated hereafter are only as truthful as the petitioner. The tone of this article expresses a style of writing historically employed by America’s greatest writers and, as such, is for opinion purposes only. No intentional harm is due. Do not read if the topic of divorce (even your own) causes you emotional distress. Continue at your own risk.
By late afternoon on May 6, 2026, a petition filed in Cook County Circuit Court had placed another marriage into the formal cadence of the domestic relations system. Ashley Mo petitioned for dissolution from James Cole, stating in court records that both had lived in Chicago for at least ninety days before the filing. The couple married in Chicago on May 25, 2019, according to the petition, and no other dissolution case involving the parties was pending elsewhere.
The filing describes the marriage as having undergone an “irretrievable breakdown” caused by irreconcilable differences and difficulties. It states that reconciliation efforts had failed and that future attempts would not be practical or in the parties’ best interests. The petition further notes that, by the time a judgment is entered, the parties will have been separated for more than six months.
Ashley Mo asked the court to award her an equitable share of marital property as well as certain non-marital property identified under Illinois law. The filing also requests that possession of the parties’ dog be allocated between them. No children were born to or adopted during the marriage, according to the petition, and the filing states that Ashley Mo is not pregnant.
Domestic relations courts routinely handle matters that are deeply personal through a framework designed to be orderly and procedural. Petitions like this one often mark the beginning of a quieter transition — one measured less by public dispute than by the gradual division of responsibilities, property, and shared routines under court supervision.
Please contact VowBreakers for access to documents related to the case.