Disclaimer: All facts gleaned from the filings stated hereafter are only as truthful as the petitioner. The tone of this article expresses a style of writing historically employed by America’s greatest writers and, as such, is for opinion purposes only. No intentional harm is due. Do not read if the topic of divorce (even your own) causes you emotional distress. Continue at your own risk.
There are endings that arrive quietly, without the weight of spectacle, just the sound of one life stepping away from another. Nicolae Dorlea, 57, has reached such a place. Through his attorney Jon Tomos, he filed a Petition for Dissolution of Marriage in Cook County, Illinois, on October 1, 2025, seeking to dissolve his marriage to Phyllis Ryerson. The two were married on December 4, 2002, in Chicago, a city that had been both their home and witness to over two decades of shared history.
The petition makes no mention of conflict beyond the formal phrase: irreconcilable differences. It is the vocabulary of distance, the shorthand of lives that have grown apart in small, imperceptible ways. There are no children of the marriage—none born, none adopted—and the court is asked simply to dissolve the bond that once held them.
Nicolae’s filing invokes the Illinois Marriage and Dissolution of Marriage Act, affirming that all efforts at reconciliation have failed and that any future attempts would be “impracticable.” Beneath that word lies the acknowledgment of a truth both quiet and final: that what once was shared has become something separate. The petition requests dissolution and reserves for later the questions of property, maintenance, and allocation of assets—a pause before the final division of what remains.
In the end, the document is less an act of rupture than of release—a record of two paths that began together and now, at last, move apart.
Please contact VowBreakers for access to documents related to the case.
