Disclaimer: All facts gleaned from the filings stated hereafter are only as truthful as the petitioner. The tone of this article expresses a style of writing historically employed by America’s greatest writers and, as such, is for opinion purposes only. No intentional harm is due. Do not read if the topic of divorce (even your own) causes you emotional distress. Continue at your own risk.
On August 8, 2025, in the Circuit Court of St. Louis City, the fragile line between endurance and collapse was crossed. Tony D. Lumpkins, a longtime resident of Missouri, filed a petition to dissolve his marriage to Angilisa M. Lumpkins, a union that began on April 28, 2001, in St. Louis. The filing, carried through by his attorneys, Brandee D. Iannelli and Kevin L. Wibbenmeyer of Wibbenmeyer Iannelli Law, LLC, signals an end to a relationship that had already withered since the couple’s constructive separation in September 2015.
No children were born of the marriage, a fact that narrows the focus of the court’s work to the matter of property and debts, rather than custody or child support. The petition notes that the couple acquired assets and obligations over the years, and Tony asks the court to divide them equitably. He further requests that his separate property remain his alone, a boundary meant to preserve what fragments of independence remain after nearly twenty-five years of shared history.
In his sworn statement, Tony attested that the marriage is irretrievably broken, with no reasonable hope of repair. Neither he nor Angilisa serve in the military, another element simplifying the legal untangling. What remains now is a judicial process to formalize what the passage of time and the persistence of distance have already made clear: that two lives once bound together must now be set apart, their shared past archived in the quiet pages of the court record.
Please contact VowBreakers for access to documents related to the case.
