Disclaimer: All facts gleaned from the filings stated hereafter are only as truthful as the petitioner. The tone of this article expresses a style of writing historically employed by America’s greatest writers and, as such, is for opinion purposes only. No intentional harm is due. Do not read if the topic of divorce (even your own) causes you emotional distress. Continue at your own risk.

The year opens quietly, without fireworks, but with paperwork. While January 1, 2026 is usually sold as a reset—gym memberships, fresh calendars, carefully staged optimism—it also becomes, for some, a moment to formalize what has been finished for a long time. That is the posture of Irvin John Taylor’s petition for dissolution of marriage, filed that day in the Circuit Court of St. Louis County, Missouri, against Sherrie A. Taylor.

The marriage began in Ferguson on June 22, 1985, registered in St. Louis County, and unraveled long before the filing itself. The parties separated around May 1, 2000, a gap of more than two decades that renders the new year filing less a rupture than a delayed acknowledgment. By the time the petition arrives at the courthouse, both parties are retired, both self-supporting, and both long removed from the domestic routines that once defined them.

Represented by attorney Michael P. Cohan of The Cohan Law Firm, LLC, Taylor asks the court to dissolve the marriage on the grounds that it is irretrievably broken, with no reasonable likelihood of preservation. The petition outlines a clean, almost minimalist request for closure: that each party retain their respective separate property; that marital property and marital debts be divided fairly and equitably pursuant to an existing property settlement and separation agreement; and that neither party be awarded maintenance, with any such order expressly non-modifiable. No child-related relief is sought, as the couple’s two children are adults, emancipated, and self-supporting.

If end-of-year filings often feel like last-minute reckonings, this New Year’s Day petition reads differently. It does not gesture toward reinvention. Instead, it documents finality—proof that sometimes the cleanest way to begin a year is to confirm what has already ended.

Please contact VowBreakers for access to documents related to the case.