Disclaimer: All facts gleaned from the filings stated hereafter are only as truthful as the petitioner. The tone of this article expresses a style of writing historically employed by America’s greatest writers and, as such, is for opinion purposes only. No intentional harm is due. Do not read if the topic of divorce (even your own) causes you emotional distress. Continue at your own risk.

In a recent filing in Cook County, Illinois, Tammy Lee Swanson submitted a petition for the dissolution of her marriage to David Joseph Swanson, filed on December 6, 2023. The couple, married since July 29, 1989, attributes the dissolution to irreconcilable differences, asserting that all attempts at reconciliation have proven futile, deeming future efforts impracticable and not in the best interests of the family.

The petition, handled by attorney Marly R. Tristano from Tristano & Tristano, Ltd., outlines Tammy’s prayers, including a judgment of dissolution of marriage, the preservation of non-marital property for each party, and Tammy’s request to be awarded at least half of all personal property. Additionally, Tammy seeks the court’s approval for the use and enjoyment of her maiden or former married name, if desired, and other relief deemed just and equitable.

Despite the absence of children in the marriage, Tammy emphasizes the importance of a fair division of both marital and non-marital property, addressing the financial needs arising from the union. The filing quotes the couple’s mutual agreement on the issues concerning the dissolution of their marriage, underscoring a collaborative approach to the process.

Noteworthy quotes from the filing include explicit details on the irreconcilable differences leading to the irretrievable breakdown of the marriage and Tammy’s request for the court to award her a significant portion of the parties’ personal property. The filing also stresses the parties’ full agreement on matters related to the dissolution, highlighting a potentially amicable resolution.

Please contact VowBreakers for access to documents related to the case.