Disclaimer: All facts gleaned from the filings stated hereafter are only as truthful as the petitioner. The tone of this article expresses a style of writing historically employed by America’s greatest writers and, as such, is for opinion purposes only. No intentional harm is due. Do not read if the topic of divorce (even your own) causes you emotional distress. Continue at your own risk.
In Jackson County, Missouri, at Independence, a petition filed April 10, 2026 at 1:21 PM sets out in procedural terms the unravelling of a marriage that began in December 2000 in Lexington, Lafayette County. The filing, brought in the Circuit Court, records the parties as Holly S. Codfrey and James L. Godfrey, both Missouri residents, both described as employed, and both now positioned within the formal architecture of dissolution proceedings.
The petition places the breakdown in time as well as in law. The parties, it states, separated on or about March 11, 2026. After more than two decades of marriage, the pleading language turns on a familiar statutory hinge: irreconcilable differences have led to an irretrievable breakdown, with reconciliation described as no longer viable.
What follows is less narrative than allocation. Three children are referenced, though not named in the record, and the filing outlines an arrangement seeking joint legal and physical custody, with a structured schedule and shared responsibility. Child support is to be determined under Missouri guidelines, with payments directed through the state payment system. Medical coverage, uninsured expenses, and educational costs are to be divided proportionally. The petition also contemplates the tax treatment of the children, proposing alternating or assigned claims beginning with the 2025 tax year.
Financially, the filing moves through standard categories: marital property, marital debt, and non-marital assets are to be identified and divided in a manner described as fair and equitable, or alternatively governed by any agreement the parties may reach. It also seeks maintenance for the petitioner and asks for contribution toward attorney’s fees and costs. Neither party is described as a member of the armed forces, and no pregnancy is indicated. The legal framing is, in effect, comprehensive: support, property, and responsibility all placed before the court in parallel tracks.
What remains, after the procedural detail is set out, is the quieter fact of institutional transition. A marriage that spans twenty-five years is now subject to statutory division, with arrangements for children, assets, and obligations to be determined through judicial process rather than private continuity. The filing records not rupture alone, but the administrative form that follows it, where time is measured in filings, responses, and orders yet to come.
Please contact VowBreakers for access to documents related to the case.
